Understanding Common Correspondent Banking Structures

Correspondent banking plays a vital role in facilitating international transactions and access to financial services across jurisdictions. Three main structures are used in correspondent banking: Traditional, Nested, and Payable-Through (Pass-Through) accounts. Each structure comes with its unique functionalities, risks, and compliance implications.

1. Traditional Correspondent Banking

In a traditional setup, a respondent bank provides its customers with access to foreign financial services by using its account with a correspondent bank located in the foreign jurisdiction. Customers, however, do not have direct access to the correspondent account.

· Key Features:

o Customers interact only with the respondent bank, which acts as an intermediary.

o The respondent bank leverages the services of the correspondent bank for foreign transactions, such as clearing payments or facilitating international wire transfers.

2. Nested Banking

Nested banking occurs when multiple respondent banks use the correspondent relationship of another respondent bank to access foreign financial services.

· Key Features:

o Nested banks do not have a direct relationship with the ultimate correspondent bank.

o This structure introduces additional layers of transactions, increasing complexity and compliance risks.

o Services are accessed indirectly through the respondent bank holding the account with the correspondent bank.

3. Payable-Through (Pass-Through) Accounts

A payable-through account (PTA) is a type of correspondent banking arrangement where the respondent bank’s customers can directly access the correspondent account to perform banking activities, bypassing the respondent bank.

· Key Features:

o Customers can independently conduct transactions, such as making deposits or initiating wire transfers.

o PTAs provide convenience and flexibility for customers but are considered high-risk due to the lack of respondent bank oversight.

o They require stringent due diligence and compliance measures to prevent misuse.

Compliance and Risks

Payable-through accounts, though efficient, are associated with significant compliance challenges, such as money laundering risks. Nested banking structures also pose risks due to their multi-layered nature, which can obscure transparency. Financial institutions must adopt robust anti-money laundering (AML) programs and know-your-customer (KYC) protocols to mitigate these risks. Regular monitoring and clear reporting mechanisms are crucial for maintaining the integrity of correspondent banking operations.

By understanding the nuances of these structures and implementing strong compliance measures, financial institutions can better manage risks while leveraging the benefits of correspondent banking.

‍