Will Regulatory Freezes Drive More FinTechs to Become Neobanks?

As regulatory scrutiny on bank-FinTech partnerships intensifies, a growing number of FinTech companies may be reconsidering their reliance on traditional banking-as-a-service (BaaS) models. Many FinTechs have historically partnered with licensed banks to offer financial services without the burden of securing their own banking charters. However, with increased oversight, evolving compliance requirements, and rising operational risks, some FinTechs are exploring a more independent path—transitioning into fully licensed neobanks.

The Shift from BaaS to Neobanking

BaaS models have enabled FinTechs to launch financial products quickly and efficiently by leveraging bank partners for regulatory compliance, deposit management, and lending capabilities. However, recent regulatory crackdowns on third-party relationships—particularly those involving FinTechs and sponsor banks—have introduced new uncertainties. As a result, some FinTechs are assessing whether the neobank model provides a more sustainable, long-term strategy.

The appeal of becoming a fully licensed bank includes:

· Greater operational control: Managing deposits, lending, and payments without reliance on third-party banks.

· Expanded product offerings: The ability to offer a broader range of financial services without constraints imposed by BaaS partnerships.

· Increased revenue potential: Retaining a larger share of transaction and interest income rather than splitting earnings with banking partners.

· Stronger regulatory positioning: Mitigating risks associated with evolving BaaS compliance requirements.

Challenges in Securing a Banking License

While becoming a fully licensed neobank offers clear advantages, the transition is not without hurdles. The bank charter approval process remains complex, requiring extensive regulatory scrutiny and capital commitments. Over the past 15 years, the pace of new bank charters has been slow, making it difficult for FinTechs to gain approval. Some key challenges include:

· Lengthy approval timelines: The process of obtaining a banking license can take years, delaying market entry.

· Capital and liquidity requirements: Banks are subject to strict capital adequacy and liquidity regulations, which can be challenging for early-stage FinTechs.

· Regulatory compliance burdens: Becoming a regulated bank requires robust risk management, compliance infrastructure, and ongoing oversight, increasing operational costs.

For many FinTechs, these challenges outweigh the potential benefits, making BaaS a more practical solution despite regulatory risks. However, larger, well-funded FinTechs with established market presence and strong compliance capabilities may view neobanking as a strategic investment in long-term autonomy.

Regulatory Pressures Driving Change

Recent regulatory developments suggest that FinTech-bank partnerships will continue to face heightened scrutiny. Authorities are increasingly focused on ensuring that bank sponsors maintain full accountability over their FinTech partners’ activities, with some regulators questioning whether BaaS models introduce systemic risks.

As compliance expectations become more stringent and costly, some FinTechs may find the regulatory uncertainty too risky and opt for greater independence through neobank charters. However, others may double down on BaaS partnerships, working more closely with regulators to refine compliance frameworks rather than pursuing full banking status.

The Future of FinTech-Bank Relationships

While it remains uncertain whether more FinTechs will aggressively pursue bank charters, the industry is clearly at an inflection point. The future of digital finance could see a mix of strategies, with:

1. Some FinTechs securing bank charters to gain full control over their operations.

2. Others enhancing their BaaS compliance frameworks to mitigate regulatory risks while maintaining partnerships.

3. A potential rise in hybrid models, where FinTechs leverage banking licenses for core functions while still partnering with financial institutions for specialized services.

Regardless of the approach, regulatory pressures are reshaping the landscape, compelling FinTechs to reevaluate their business models in search of greater stability and long-term growth.

‍