Daniel Ikenson
Director of Cato's Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies
Get Updates from Daniel Ikenson
Time for some rapprochement in U.S.-China economic relations
Has the Chinese government indulged in protectionist, provocative or otherwise illiberal policies that have, on occasion, violated its commitment to the rules of international trade? Yes.
Do the Chinese maintain other policies that very likely would be found to violate China’s WTO obligations? Yes.
Is the U.S. government within its rights to bring formal complaints about benefit-impairing Chinese trade practices to the World Trade Organization for adjudication and resolution? Yes.
But before getting all righteous and patriotic and demanding that China be deemed an economic pariah worthy of exceptionally harsh treatment, keep in mind that the U.S. government has been found out of compliance with its WTO obligations more than any other WTO member, and it remains out of compliance on a few issues to this very day.
To read more, click here.
-
The path to sustainable economic growth: While the year started with...
-
High Noon at the High Court: Today, the U.S. Supreme Court...
-
U.S.-Korea free trade starts as opposition in Seoul vows repeal: Lowering barriers to trade...
-
No Winners in U.S.-China Trade War: No one wins in a trade war.
-
Stakeholder Capitalism: ‘Third way’ economics ignores...
To add comments please
Login